This item was moved up on the agenda at the request of the Commission. CONSIDERATION OF ADDENDUM NO. 16-01, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2016-178, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT NO. 16-04, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 16-10 AND 16-11 FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE, IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING 653 RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS, 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL TENANT SPACE AND A 146-ROOM HOTEL LOCATED ON AN APPROXIMATELY THIRTY- ACRE SITE AT THE NORTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS OF BIRCH STREET AND STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD.
Associate Planner Star Haro gave the presentation.
City Planner Lilley provided a list of administrative changes to the proposed resolutions as follows:
TPM RESOLUTION
-
Condition o: remove construction replace with building
Modified to address request by applicant
-
Condition o1: remove construction replace with building
Modified to address request by applicant
-
Condition o2: remove construction replace with building. Remove monthly replace with quarterly.
Modified to address request by applicant
Commissioner request to add language. Final sentence “Staff shall submit said report to the Planning Commission.”
-
Condition 03: remove monthly replace quarterly.
Modified to address request by applicant
Commissioner request to add language. Final sentence “Staff shall submit said report to the Planning Commission.”
PD/CUP RESOLUTION
-
Condition c: remove Friday replace with Saturday.
Change hours from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm to 7:00 am to 7:00 pm
Correct error from direction provided at the April meeting.
-
Condition f.1: Add condition “Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis or equivalent acceptable to the City Planner demonstrating interior noise levels will conform to the standard of 45 dBA CNEL, or a level deemed equal or better by the Building Official. All required noise reduction measures shall be incorporated into building plans in a manner meeting the approval and satisfaction of the Building Official and the City Planner.”
Commissioner request to address concern with noise attenuation.
-
Condition o7: remove grading and replace with building
Modified to address request by applicant
-
Condition r. 6: add condition “Include a program and identify location for electric vehicle charging stations.”
To correct an omission from previous Commission direction
-
Condition x: remove “for Building A and B residential tenant and Hotel guests”.
To refine based on previous Commission direction
-
Condition M remove weekdays and replace with Monday through Saturday and remove 8:00 am to 5:00 pm and replace with 7:00 am to 7:00 pm
To correct an error from previous Commission direction.
-
Condition cc. 3. Remove for Building A and B residential tenants. Hotel guests shall be allowed to participate in the bicycle program.
To refine based on previous Commission direction.
-
Condition dd: remove Friday and replace with Saturday. Remove 8:00 am to 5:00 pm and replace with 7:00 am to 7:00 pm.
To correct an error from previous Commission direction.
Commissioner Fox asked about guest parking and bike lending policy.
Chair McGrade asked the applicant to clarify its request to do a 30/30 finish in public areas and a 20/30 finish in areas that were less visible.
Bhavesh Parikh explained the difference in the two finishes.
City Planner Lilley stated that the wording of the item gives the Commission the flexibility of bringing back finishes to a study session for the Commission to approve.
Chair McGrade expressed his appreciation to Hines for working with the residents and making needed modifications, including setbacks, massing, density and height.
Commissioner Schlotterbeck confirmed she met with residents and encouraged the public to reach out to her. Assured the public that these conditions would be part of the approval process. Thanked the Hines team for meeting with the public in addressing their concerns. She supports the project with the conditions that have been adjusted.
Vice Chair Willis in his site visit felt the height of the building was too high and that the density was too much. But with the work done between Commission, residents and Hines it now feels like the right project.
Commissioner Fox can't say she loves the project but commended Hines and City staff for making adjustments to project from residents concerns. She is pleasantly surprised at the lowered height.
Commissioner Grosse thanked Hines for making modifications to the project and with that he supports the project.
Chair McGrade cares deeply about the City of Brea and looks out for the interests of the residents, entitlements, zoning interests of the developer and balance all of that. With the changes that were made, he will be supporting the project.
Commissioner Schlotterbeck moved to approve with modified conditions. Vice Chair Willis seconded the motion.
Motion passed by a vote of 5-0.